No idea if that's due to an error in the methodology, or I'm just no good at estimating pairing popularity, or smaller/rarer pairings are more popular on LJ. Do you think the latter might have something to do with it?
LJ interests may not be very trustworthy because some people (like me) add interests haphazardly and it may be that they don't even have the more popular pairing as an interest at all. But who knows? Since it's impossible to tell, I say carry on!
The description of the dynamics of James/Snape made me smile. I'm looking forward to hearing more about your research! A fascinating subject.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
momijizukamori
no subject
Date: 2010-02-21 06:15 pm (UTC)LJ interests may not be very trustworthy because some people (like me) add interests haphazardly and it may be that they don't even have the more popular pairing as an interest at all. But who knows? Since it's impossible to tell, I say carry on!
The description of the dynamics of James/Snape made me smile. I'm looking forward to hearing more about your research! A fascinating subject.